bruno: a review

Bruno has received some pretty scathing reviews. The Los Angeles Times wrote that it ”piles even more stereotypes and discomfort onto an already hostile climate.” GLAAD released a statement arguing that the movie “decreases the public’s comfort with gay people.” And even Fox News asked the question, “Is Bruno harmful to gay and lesbian causes, or just really funny?” (Yes, I looked up what Fox News said only for reference.  I like to see what everyone is saying.)

I happen to think that being funny doesn’t excuse you from being homophobic or contributing to homophobia. I also think Bruno is a project that contributes positively to the fight for equality and documents the real hatred and craziness gripping many corners of this country.

Sacha Baron Cohen’s films push people beyond their limits of tolerance in order to elicit extreme reactions.  His films are like no other.  I don’t recommend my parents rush to the theatre to watch, these films are not for them.  These films aren’t for a lot of people.  

Think of the self defense scene: when one dildo doesn’t get a rise out of the southern gentleman teaching Bruno how to defend against the “homosexual,” he brings in two, then three dildos. It is a concrete example of the method his characters use to approach all situations.

Bruno pushes people to confront homosexuality.  I have never understood the disgust that heterosexual people have for homosexual people.  I went to see this movie with my husband.  Were there moments that we could have lived our life without ever seeing, yes.  But seeing a movie about gay characters doesn’t make him less of a heterosexual.  It actually makes me proud that he so embraces who he is that he can watch a movie with hands down more male frontal nudity than female.  

Many arguments are against the further stereotyping of gay men.  In my opinion, Bruno exposes violent and shocking intolerance by being so stereotypically gay, for example, hunters in the backwoods recognize and react to his sexuality. Bruno’s appearance is a tool for exposing the intolerance that exists in many people whether or not the person they are talking to sashays particularly heavily or hits on them particularly forcefully.  I wondered if I would feel like I was laughing at the “gayness.”  I am an advocate of this population and I don’t want to “laugh at” anything at their expense.  I caught myself laughing at the reactions he was evoking.  I caught myself feeling terribly disappointed and outraged at the reactions of many of the heterosexual men reacting to Bruno.  I didn’t feel the “stereotyping” of the flamboyant gay man was what was so funny.  Bruno was funny because of Bruno.

You can’t politely turn your back on Bruno and you can’t write his actions off to eccentricity or “foreignness.”

In some cases, Cohen chose to reinforce particularly negative stereotypes of gay people, including the notion that gay men are sex obsessed and have no ability to raise children without exposing them to sexual activity at an inappropriately young age.  It was shown in a format that unless you are completely bigoted and ignorant, you realize that that is a ridiculous stereotype.  

I think most audience members will laugh at Bruno’s ridiculous portrayal of gayness, but some will use the negative aspects of Cohen’s satire to justify their hatred. They will sympathize with those characters reacting violently to his sexuality. These are not the people the movement for LGBT equality is hoping to recruit. They are a lost causes whether or not Bruno inadvertently reinforces their homophobia.  My money is on the fact that they won’t go to see a movie with a lead gay character anyway.

Those audience members who consider themselves to be decent, tolerant individuals (perhaps they want to reserve marriage for straight people, but think gay people are okay as long as they aren’t too flamboyant) will identify with Sasha Baron Cohen who is, after all, playing a great big joke on the homophobes. They will be shocked by the violence of some of the reactions in the movie. They will want to disassociate themselves from the bigots and hatemongers who throw chairs at a couple kissing in a wrestling ring and contemplate ways to break the bones of gay men in case they make a sexual advance.

Everyone who sees this film will be forced to confront the fact that we still live in a world where being gay is a dangerous proposition. Members of the gay community are threatened by violence and community reprisal, everyday.  I actually walked away with maybe even a better appreciation of the struggle people living in the LGBT community face.

Sasha Baron Cohen quite literally risked his life over and over again to illustrate this point. He did it while creating a sympathetic story, funny jokes and an overall entertaining movie.

Bruno is an act of bravery.

It is my opinion that the LGBT community could actually use this movie to assist in the fight for equality rather than boycotting the over-the-top antics of a comedic superstar.

1 comments
willsa
willsa

right on sista! We had so much fun with you guys! Everything you sai, I agree wityh - stereotypes are stupid and they ARE funny if you arenbt so wrapped up in preconceived notions of how people "should be" rather than embracing what is! Love you girl!